User talk:2rh

Welcome!

Hello, 2rh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Bienvenue, I've removed your email address from your user page - this is _NOT_ displayed. Please see User Account Settings for an alternative Wikipedia email mechanism. Thanks, Ian Cairns (talk)

Hello, you used the {{helpme}} tag but you did not post a question. Please write out your question and when you are done, place back the tag. I or someone else will be along to help. Alternatively, you can join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. (Click here for instant access). Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 14:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing a “Pareto principle history”

Reporting the talk from “Pareto principle”

80-20 rule ?? - For my part, I've ever heard of a "20-80 rule" so far.

May be this is not very important. But the starting point of organisation is to aim at better comfort and efficiency, isn'it ? So, admitted that the basical form is "x-y rule", the fact that Pareto allowes us to organize better refers to the y/x ratio, describing the increasing effect of a right distribution as "four times more than invested". And the corresponding ratio is 20-80, not 80-20, that warns us not to forget that decreasing effect(s) do follow the phenomenon. Is that correct ? 2rh (talk) 13:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unless the correct form in english is "y-x rule" Is it ??? 2rh (talk) 13:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pareto principle - For my part, i've heard that "Pareto's principle is "not to get a linear distribution", for a linea distribution is impossible to organize (source : ENISE 1974). As a consequence of it, Pareto's principle can't be reduced to on of its ratios, even if on of them is very popular. The second most popular ratio of a Pareto distribution beeing "50-95" (still admitted - question above - that the correct form of a ration in english is "x-y", not "y-x" 2rh (talk) 13:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concluding that “Pareto principle” and one of its ratios, whatever, should be separated nowadays.
Introducing the apparently unedited observation that the french philoopher René Descartes has already introduced the further so called “Pareto principle” (please, learn more in french on my site [[1]])
Considering the editing rule according which unedited facts should not be reported on an encyclopedy
Suggesting that a solution about “Pareto principle history” has to be found anyway, in the “Pareto guideline” with or without its new page on Wikipedia, and a possible link to my site; presently providing the expected information in french. What do you think ? 2rh (talk) 14:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your message to me

I have replied to you on my talk page. It will not have alerted you, but this manual message from me will alert you. Regards, Ian Cairns (talk) 19:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see Template:Talkback Ian Cairns (talk) 21:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]