User talk:2Memphis

2Memphis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 2Memphis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

{unblock|@JamesBWatson I'm not a sock puppet or multie account user. However if I somehow violate Wikipedia policy I sincerely apologise I don't know as I'm completely new to Wikipedia guide me thank you 2Memphis (talk) 17:10, 3 August 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2Memphis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@JamesBWatson I admit that somehow violate Wikipedia policy because I didn't knew that about sockpuppet. I have read in depth about it, I sincerely Apologise for that & I promise I will not do any violation in future. Looking forward to get unblock, Thank you! 2Memphis (talk) 09:28, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here, you admit to your violations of WP:SOCK. But the previous unblock request, you indicate you weren't involved in any violations of WP:SOCK. These statements are contradictory, so you'll need to clarify exactly what's going on. You are welcome to make a new unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2Memphis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you Yamla for welcoming me to make a new unblock request. Here, I'm clarifying that I didn't knew about WP:SOCK when I made the first unblock request, as I'm new to wikipedia. But now I studied about WP:SOCK & I admit that I violate Wikipedia policy, I again apologise for that & I promise I will not do any kind of violation in future. Thank you 2Memphis (talk) 11:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

User is no longer wishing to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It would help the next reviewing administrator if you listed all the accounts you used. There's still a contradiction here. You initially stated that you did not use multiple accounts, now you are saying you have. --Yamla (talk) 11:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Yamla for your help. I only used one account called Irsashahid which was my friend's account. I will not use any account in future I promise and you can delete this account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2Memphis (talk • contribs)

So, just to be very clear, when you earlier said you had not used multiple accounts, that was a lie? And what reason do we have to believe this is a case of WP:MEAT and not WP:SOCK? That is, why should we believe you when you say this was your friend's account, and not just another example of you evading another block? --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla I admit that I lied cause i thought if I admit wikipedia will banned me for lifetime. My friend was not using her account called Irsashahid so she why give it to me I only used her account one time. I don't know it is a case of WP:SOCK or WP:MEAT you know better than me. I apologise again I will not violate Wikipedia policy in future. You can delete my account I'm leaving I will never ever come back to Wikipedia thank you and I'm sorry ;( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2Memphis (talk • contribs)

We can't delete accounts. However, you do not need to take any further action. We can leave this account blocked. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that you have used only those two accounts. Please list all of the accounts you have used. As long as there is even one account I know of that you have not admitted to I will not unblock you, nor will I support any proposal for any other administrator to unblock you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]