User talk:2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:0:0:63AA:8BA4
Welcome!
[edit]Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --đŠDrWho42đ» 12:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit] Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.
The source you are using in the article Let them eat cake specifically debunks the claims you are using it to support. You cannot use a source which says "X didn't actually say Y" to support the claim "X said Y indirectly". The remainder of your edit to that article is a coatrack of attacks and original research where you stitch together a random hodgepodge of complaints about Macron that have nothing to do with the subject of the article. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- It doesnât debunk the claim : « On a eu notamment le sujet du mĂ©tier des Ă©boueurs qui a Ă©tĂ© extrĂȘmement important ces derniers temps dans lâactualitĂ©. Câest un mĂ©tier qui est pĂ©nible. En vĂ©ritĂ©, peu de Français auraient envie de faire ce mĂ©tier-lĂ , câest un difficile, pĂ©nible, de premiĂšre ligne, sans doute pas assez rĂ©munĂ©rĂ©. [âŠ] Les Ă©boueurs, heureusement, ils ne partaient dĂ©jĂ pas Ă 62 ans, ils partaient avant. Et peut-ĂȘtre mĂȘme que la question, câest pas quâils partent Ă 57 ans en Ă©tant Ă©boueurs, câest peut-ĂȘtre quâils soient mieux formĂ©s de maniĂšre Ă pouvoir changer, Ă©voluer de mĂ©tier. »
- I also know peronsally example which prove you can depart sonner in that case if you get disabled because your of such job is wrong. 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:0:0:63AA:8BA4 (talk) 12:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits as a WP:BLP vio. Please do not reinsert them without consensus on the talk page. You cannot use a source which states that this person didn't actually say anything that could be constructed as "let them eat cake" and that the claims were twitter nonsense to support adding this to the article "let them eat cake". 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a violation as per WP:BLP#Public figures. Only you is bringing the article claims she never said anything like that. « Itâs maybe that they get better teatching in order to evolve, change from a job » 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:0:0:63AA:8BA4 (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Just because someone is a public figure it doesn't mean you can add claims that they said things to articles with sources saying they didn't actually say them! You need to read the sections on balance, attack pages and the uses of sources.
- This content really doesn't belong in that article at all, as it's a twitter nontroversey of no real significance, but if it is included you need to accurately reflect what the sources say, i.e. that it was claimed that she made these comments and those claims spread around twitter, but that she didn't actually say them. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- Not a violation as per WP:BLP#Public figures. Only you is bringing the article claims she never said anything like that. « Itâs maybe that they get better teatching in order to evolve, change from a job » 2A01:E0A:401:A7C0:0:0:63AA:8BA4 (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edits as a WP:BLP vio. Please do not reinsert them without consensus on the talk page. You cannot use a source which states that this person didn't actually say anything that could be constructed as "let them eat cake" and that the claims were twitter nonsense to support adding this to the article "let them eat cake". 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |