User talk:2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C

Hungarian Wikipedia

There's nothing that can be done on en.wikipedia about the Hungarian wikipedia. They are two separate entities. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC) I was asking for it to be delisted. --2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 12:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 13:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Block is a blatant false positive. 2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 13:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your contributions show otherwise and nothing in your request convinces me differently. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only bad thing I did was call someone a criminal. Everything else is fine. 2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 13:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Tiderolls 13:55, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please revert this reversion

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Kingsman_(franchise)&diff=prev&oldid=1065622351 --2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Asher, please read WP:OVERLINK.[reply]

It's inappropriate for you to solicit others to help you evade your block. Stop it. You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion or not, what Asher did still goes against the Manual of Style. --2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is not your concern, and is an inappropriate use of this talk page. I want to be clear, you will not get another warning. --Yamla (talk) 16:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know what I did was wrong and I promise to stop making BLP violations. I promise to actually be a volunteer, stop attacking Asher for making false positives, take reversions I want to contest to the talk page, and not evade my block by using VPNs. Please give me a second chance. 2A01:36D:1200:4D41:D9E6:E7D4:9D38:6C3C (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below, and non-response from blocked user in three days. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I believe that it is dishonest at best to not mention your good-hand-account here. SQL ^{Query Me!} 20:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.