User talk:2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B
New message from Tarlby
[edit]
Message added 17:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tarlby (t) (c) 17:34, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- It would be a good idea for Wikipedia editors to learn critical thinking, we did in my day in ubversity, you rwead sources and judge if there is bias, if you have a with problem that, and think that is aunfair thing, then I am sorry, but it is good to say to Wikipedia that the level of critical thinking about sources in the Alba Party article is poor, and it would be regardesd as a fail in any university course in my day, and rightly so, you would not want a professional to have that lack of critical thinking, if he was helping you. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 17:47, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please see these policies and essays:
WP:V, WP:RS, WP:TRUTH, WP:ORSoon, it'll be 20 years since these guidelines were created. I don't think consensus in ending them will happen anytime soon. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)- All that happened was some unpleasant bullies insulted me for making a complaint, how horrible, nasty. This Cullen328 just insulted me. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Please see these policies and essays:
I have blocked you from editing Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The report is closed; nothing you add there will do anything positive for you. If you continue disrupting the work of Wikipedia volunteers on other pages, you may be blocked from those, or from the entire site, as well. Drmies (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- What a bunch of bullies, not very nice people, no compassion and just insults, 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- You are attempting to contribute to the #7 website in the world, with billions of monthly page views. Before ranting and raving in a highly visible venue like ANI, you should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines and social norms. One such norm is that editors are expected to be concise. Another is that we don't do forced apologies. Another is that we don't engage in David Icke hyperbole, or anything like it. Another is that when you criticize an editor by username (as you just did me), you notify that editor. Another is that this is an encyclopedia not a journalistic venture. Cullen328 (talk) 18:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes so if you write an article then you take the time to substantiate the sources, And there was no attempt to substantiate the Alba Article, sources, Rival politicians, and a flippant offhand article were taken as sources to label Alba as socially conservative when they are clearly socially liberal, they have no socially conservative policies. And when I critiqued that, the said editor I complained about, claimed completely unfairly that I was comparing editors to Holocaust deniers which I absolutely was not, And then claimed I was making multiple comparisons to David Icke, again I had only made one, not as a comparison to Wikipedia editors, but as a example of a source and example of why you should never not substantiate sources. To this horrible things were said about me, and you have piled in, which is just bullying, I am being insulted for saying you should substantiate sources, which is actually true, of course you should, and no bullies we will stop me saying you substantiate sources, especially on the 7th largest website in the world. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- And I never said anybody weas a holocaust denier, and I certainly never said any Wikipedia editor was David Icke, I was saying he is a example of why sources should be substantiated, and presuming you would all agree that was a also a example of someone you would not pick as a source as it would not be something you could substantiate then I took it back realising that was a bad example to choose, and then was told I keep comparing everybody to David Icke, which I was not, and for this I got abuse. Totally unreasonable, 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Let's just disengage from this conversation, all of us. It's not healthy. I'll stop commenting here and go on with my day. Will you? Tarlby (t) (c) 18:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- IP, you are wrong in countless ways. Please read Wikipedia:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass, and then go do something useful instead of wasting other editor's time. Cullen328 (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- So do you think people should substantiate sources, should the ALba article sources be substantiated or are you happy with offand uninterested sources and rival politicians defining the party. As I think that is not good work on sources, or do you just not care, and that kind of integrity for this article is it like important or unimportant to you as a editor, does the integrity of the sources matter to you as a editor. If so in what sense. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Drop the stick or get blocked. Cullen328 (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Does the integrity of articles sources matter, PS, have you heard of the term Mystery shopper, :) 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- So some wikipedia editors think that arguing for integrity for sources, and arguing for not having biased flimsy sources, is a reason to ban someone. I won't edit on this site again, but quite honestly, the bullying nature of the guy who banned me, I won't say the bullies name, but he knows who he is, a
- , just as I support sources being reputable. Is nothing to be proud about. It is not vandalism or disruptive to think sources should be accurate, and shame on the bullies who banned me, for such a reason. No wonder wikipedia is full of opinion, and innacuracy, what sort of person writes a enclopedia, and does not care about the strength of sources. That's all from me, and shame on all those who think integrity of sources does not matter, especially most laughinly regarding subjects they personally obviously don't care about. Terrible arrogance. No more editing by me, 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:9541:B21:E7F0:1D7F (talk) 19:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Does the integrity of articles sources matter, PS, have you heard of the term Mystery shopper, :) 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Drop the stick or get blocked. Cullen328 (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- So do you think people should substantiate sources, should the ALba article sources be substantiated or are you happy with offand uninterested sources and rival politicians defining the party. As I think that is not good work on sources, or do you just not care, and that kind of integrity for this article is it like important or unimportant to you as a editor, does the integrity of the sources matter to you as a editor. If so in what sense. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- IP, you are wrong in countless ways. Please read Wikipedia:Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass, and then go do something useful instead of wasting other editor's time. Cullen328 (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Let's just disengage from this conversation, all of us. It's not healthy. I'll stop commenting here and go on with my day. Will you? Tarlby (t) (c) 18:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- And I never said anybody weas a holocaust denier, and I certainly never said any Wikipedia editor was David Icke, I was saying he is a example of why sources should be substantiated, and presuming you would all agree that was a also a example of someone you would not pick as a source as it would not be something you could substantiate then I took it back realising that was a bad example to choose, and then was told I keep comparing everybody to David Icke, which I was not, and for this I got abuse. Totally unreasonable, 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yes so if you write an article then you take the time to substantiate the sources, And there was no attempt to substantiate the Alba Article, sources, Rival politicians, and a flippant offhand article were taken as sources to label Alba as socially conservative when they are clearly socially liberal, they have no socially conservative policies. And when I critiqued that, the said editor I complained about, claimed completely unfairly that I was comparing editors to Holocaust deniers which I absolutely was not, And then claimed I was making multiple comparisons to David Icke, again I had only made one, not as a comparison to Wikipedia editors, but as a example of a source and example of why you should never not substantiate sources. To this horrible things were said about me, and you have piled in, which is just bullying, I am being insulted for saying you should substantiate sources, which is actually true, of course you should, and no bullies we will stop me saying you substantiate sources, especially on the 7th largest website in the world. 2A00:23C4:B3AE:3101:6463:27AE:4C80:E87B (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- You are attempting to contribute to the #7 website in the world, with billions of monthly page views. Before ranting and raving in a highly visible venue like ANI, you should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines and social norms. One such norm is that editors are expected to be concise. Another is that we don't do forced apologies. Another is that we don't engage in David Icke hyperbole, or anything like it. Another is that when you criticize an editor by username (as you just did me), you notify that editor. Another is that this is an encyclopedia not a journalistic venture. Cullen328 (talk) 18:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 31 hours for disruptive editing, and your talk page access has been revoked. Read the Guide to appealing blocks and WP:UTRS. Cullen328 (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |