User talk:2804:7F2:2785:1261:544:312F:3F53:1B26

National Museum of Brazil fire

Please stop removing the image without discussion. You have been asked repeatedly to discuss it on the article's talkpage, here. Please do so before removing the image again. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:53, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Again, please discuss removal of the image on the talkpage. You risk being blocked if you continue to remove the image without discussion. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:56, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Your recent editing history at National Museum of Brazil fire shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Katie^talk 16:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring over photo

Hi 28. I'm responding to a thread that was started at WP:ANI#IP action at National Museum of Brazil fire regarding your repeated removal of an image. I have no opinion either way about whether the image should be there or not, but you do need to embrace the collaborative process more. Discuss with your fellow editors, on the article talk page, why you believe the image should be removed. Maybe and can persuade your fellow editors to see it your way. Or, possibly, they won't be persuaded, and you'll have to accept that consensus doesn't always go your way. Please give it a try. The alternative, i.e. continuing to just remove the image without engaging in conversation, will only end up with you getting blocked. You don't want that. I don't want that either. I hope we can avoid it. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:49, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

---