User talk:2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985

Tags

What's up with all of these? Beach drifter (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are more about the franchise itself. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are tagging things that are clearly just fine. Beach drifter (talk) 01:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notability means it needs to be talked about directly and in-depth. The articles I was tagging are mostly talking about the specific franchises with some quick mentions. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged ~~the actress that played~~ the Pink Power Ranger for notability. I could never stand that show, but she was clearly notable, pretty much a cultural icon for a while there. Beach drifter (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should do some reading on Wikipedia policy and guidelines before continuing to mass tag articles. Beach drifter (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not listening; look at the sources for these articles. Are they more about the characters themselveds or the franchise they're from? 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm listening, I understand your point. I don't agree with it. Your tags are not in line with what is explained at WP:N or various other notability guidelines. Beach drifter (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These are all completely in-universe and talk about it in the context of its fictional world. The sources also don't go in-depth at all. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That does not at all mean that these articles fail notability guidelines. It is quite obvious for nearly everything that you tagged, that the article passes WP:N. That does not mean the article is perfect, most of them are far from it. Beach drifter (talk) 01:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hear me out: I tagged these for notability because the sources are all pretty terrible. If better ones are found, they could be replaced with Sources exist. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can tell me if this is a terrible idea, but what if we got some other editors to look at them and give their opinions? 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good idea, and exactly what the talk page associated with each article is for. Beach drifter (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have seen by now, I've started discussions on each of their talk pages. If you could ping some editors for me, I'd appreciate it. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it was the character herself, not the actress. 2605:B40:1303:900:A842:6D2D:8AA1:2985 (talk) 01:36, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.