User talk:2602:304:CC61:8BD0:5D:7793:BD87:B239

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2602:304:CC61:8BD0:5D:7793:BD87:B239 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No evidence of block evasion. All edits in edit history are good faith improvements to the encyclopedia. The block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. 2602:304:CC61:8BD0:5D:7793:BD87:B239 (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is the same as your previous requests. Kuru (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I seek the reasons for your blocking this IP claiming block evasion. As per WP:GAB and WP:ADMINACCT, please respond. What is the block that is being evaded? Please see the edit history of this IP. What edits in the edit history demonstrate block evasion? Thank you in advance for your response. 2602:304:CC61:8BD0:5D:7793:BD87:B239 (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The block you are evading is the one on HughD (talk · contribs). As you are clearly just trolling, I will not respond further to your attempt to waste my time. --Yamla (talk) 16:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Under our project's policy WP:ADMINACCT, request you clarify your reasons for your article space edit of 23:44 25 April 2017‎ at article General Motors. Your edit added several paragraphs of unsourced content to the article, content tagged as unsourced since at least 2016 January, and included the section template. Your edit seems to be in violation of our project's core content policies, including WP:Verifiability and WP:No original research; please clarify if I am mistaken. Your edit added no sources. No reason was provided in the edit summary. How could this edit be considered an improvement to the encyclopedia? Please reply. Thank you in advance for your response. 2602:304:CC61:8BD0:5D:7793:BD87:B239 (talk) 17:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. You are welcome to request an unblock on your main account. --Yamla (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.