Jump to content

User talk:2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2019

[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to East Boston seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Crap! Sorry Bob! I saw this edit and thought maybe it was a test? I didn't notice your previous changes which appear to be just fine. I'll restore those changes. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My bad on that edit--I tried for a less 'explosive' word and gummed things up. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. To be fair, I gummed up the revert by also reverting the previous edits you made and not just that one... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni, since I can no longer access the article, and had intended to revert the sock's latest edits, I'll make two requests: can you or another registered account revert the unsourced content, and perhaps block the disruptive account, too? Thank you. I'm heading out on business for a few days. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I protected so I don't want to revert. Maybe k6ka will? TonyBallioni (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@TonyBallioni: Well, Ponyo stole my edit right out of my mouth. Oh well. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, all! 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It was noted in the discussion I started yesterday at ANI that Pcheeku (talk · contribs) looks a lot like a block evasion of Tcheeku (talk · contribs). Even without that, is there any reason they're not blocked? 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk), I just filed a SPI on your behalf. However, it does not seem that Tcheeku and ShirazQ are related exactly. They made conflicting edits. ―Matthew J. Long -Talk- 22:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Matthew J. Long, but ShirazQ (talk · contribs) is the alternate of Shiraz Qasmi (talk · contribs). Tcheeku (talk · contribs) was an evasion of Pcheeku (talk · contribs). Altogether, both editors, using multiple accounts, were disrupting related articles about members of the same family. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]