User talk:2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506

October 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is named 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506's talk page. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 21:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry i was not aware i was already blocked because my IP changed. I'll kindly wait till my IP changes again or the 31 hours expires. Then I will continue to fight the bias being WP:PUSHed by RandomCanadian and Shibbolethink. 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. 331dot (talk) 00:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Liz: The IP is basically telling they're going to continue their harassment after the block expires... Mind giving them an extension? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes yes, spank me daddy 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 23:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomCanadian and @Shibbolethink, you guys might want to go over to the french wikipedia and force your will over them. People are talking about DARPA(!!) on Peter's page. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Daszak 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bien merci d'avoir fait part du problème, c'est maintenant réglé. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here, a free source to cite for you and your new friends https://ici.tou.tv/decouverte/S34E04 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506,

You have to stop attacking other editors or an admin less tolerant than me will block your whole IP range for a long period of time. If you return from this short block and continue to insult and malign other editors, that will be the end of your editing career on Wikipedia. You have been warned.

You are free to dissent and disagree with other editors but you can not cast aspersions and speculate on other editor's motives. That civility rule goes for everyone, long-time editors as well as IP editors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shibbolethink has literally published a piece titled "CoVID-19 did not come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology: A discussion about theories of origin with your friendly neighborhood virologist." Does that sound like someone that wants to have a rational discussion? His actions on the lab leak page match this bias. 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 02:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He hasn't pushed for it to be included as a reliable source, has he? Unlike all people who have pushed for the Drastic website... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did I stutter? 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 03:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His actions on the lab leak page match this bias which appears to correspond to that of the scientific community, what Wikipedia must represent, via reliable sources. There's no point in personalizing this and pushing conspiracy theories about other editors, please see WP:FOC... —Paleo Neonate – 22:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.