User talk:2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:AA

March 2017

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Future of an expanding universe, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to North Attleborough, Massachusetts appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MarginalCost (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ana Navarro

Yes, she is a republican. I was trying to remove this edit from a previous IP and didn't realize I was restoring even older vandalism. Thanks for correcting my mistake. Bennv3771 (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Buffalo Sabres— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

History-merge request

See Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Rejected requests December 2019. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:5:80D:0:0:0:AA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a public IP address. Even if a bad person used it, it should spent 24 hours blocked

Decline reason:

If you were not responsible for the edits leading to the block, you can wait the 72 hours, or request that an account be created for you at WP:ACC to avoid getting caught up in blocks meant to target others. 331dot (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.