User talk:2600:387:1:809:0:0:0:B1

November 2016

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tecumseh have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 18:48, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bruce Arians. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Wikishovel (talk) 19:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dishonored, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Danski454. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Network topology have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Danski454 (talk) 08:34, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tom Herman (American football)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Ubiquity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1860 United States presidential election have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ubiquity (talk) 16:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1860 United States presidential election. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, without citing a reliable source that directly supports it. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources before making similar edits. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:41, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Good to know Wikipedia want to censor facts.

August 2019

Hello, I'm Emadix. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Matilda (chicken)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. →ᴇmɑdıx^TC 12:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Grayson Rodriguez have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---