User talk:2600:1702:6D1:28B0:15BB:B595:29A:AD56

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1702:6D1:28B0:15BB:B595:29A:AD56 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Blocking an ipv6 /19 as "vandalism only" seems rather broad

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Glad somebody else saw this and realized it was clearly a mistake to ban 2^109 IPs (~a hundred million trillion trillion?) as "vandalism only". Happy April Fools, I assume it's a rough day for y'all. 2600:1702:6D1:28B0:15BB:B595:29A:AD56 (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

---