User talk:2600:1001:B000:0:0:0:0:0/42

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1001:B000:0:0:0:0:0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

shared IP range. just because one person vandalizes doesn't mean everyone is bad

Decline reason:

Unfortunately it means we have to block the IP range to stop the vandal. If that's not you, you're welcome to request the creation of an account to edit. Huon (talk) 18:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:1001:B000:0:0:0:0:0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t understand. Why punish hundreds, possibly thousands, because of one person? I find this completely unfair. 2600:1001:B01A:B718:8B3:245B:6358:A35D (talk) 23:35, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. O Still Small Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) 23:53, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As suggested above, create an account and you will not be effected. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]