User talk:2403:580E:EB64:0:D94F:8C5E:D5B9:541D

Your edits

Hello, it appears that you're passionate about labelling people from the UK as British rather than English, etc.; we have a widely cited essay called Nationality of people from the United Kingdom that you might want to check out. The general principle in Wikipedia's Manual of Style is that when there are two ways of doing things and a substantial number of people think that one or the other is correct, we should leave the choice of which one to use to the original editors of the article. You are violating that principle by trying to enforce conformity all over Wikipedia. We also have a widely cited essay called beware of the tigers about people with strong opinions that you should know about. Edit summaries you have used in the past like "CORRECT NATIONALITY FFS!!! British" do not contribute constructively to the discourse about which nationality to use, neither do personal attacks like "CORRECT NATIONALITY FFS!!! British!!! woke pricks", which are very much not tolerated here.

Regarding your edit to Great Western Woodlands, I reverted it because in your zeal to change mentions of the UK's constituent countries to the entire UK, you introduced a mathematical error. The value of 16,000,000 hectares mentioned in the article is equivalent to 160,000 square kilometres, which is a little more than the combined area of England and Wales, as the article says. However it is less than the entire area of the United Kingdom, which is about 244,000 square kilometres.

I have made sure that all your edits have been reverted. I'm not the only one to have undone your edits; about half of them were reverted before I got there. If you continue your present editing pattern, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 04:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

---