User talk:24.68.2.110

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 24.68.2.110, is registered to Shaw Communications Inc. and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Doom (video game), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Doom (video game) was changed by 24.68.2.110 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-26T23:23:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doom (video game), you will be blocked from editing. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me 23:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm Ryanoo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vancouver have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.Ryanoo (talk) 02:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duncan, British Columbia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Ryanoo (talk) 02:44, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Victoria, British Columbia, you may be blocked from editing. Ryanoo (talk) 02:48, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did with this edit to Victoria, British Columbia. Donner60 (talk) 23:13, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 23:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm LindsayH. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lake Louise, Alberta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Happy days, Lindsay^Hello 14:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fukushima (city). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spyder212 (talk) 05:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. In fact, precipitations are not green. Spyder212 (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fukushima (city). Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 22:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Wylie39. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Whittier, Alaska—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wylie39 (talk) 22:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gold Coast, Queensland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Kerry (talk) 03:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moosonee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Puerto Peñasco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=Hi, I am a first time editor, three days ago, I was able to edit freely on any Wikipedia pages, but I am now blocked for no reason. I don't know why I am blocked from editing when all of the edits I made were beneficial. I did not perform any of the actions stated on the talk page, in fact, my talk page didn't exist 3 days ago. Please help! Thanks! ~~~~}}

. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello. Please do not remove messages from your own talk page. Doing so is disruptive editing and can cause confusion. Thank you. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove other users' messages from your own talk page. Doing so could result in being blocked from editing your own talk page. Thank you. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove any message, but this is possibly a shared ip address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.2.110 (talk • contribs)

If this is a shared address, please go home and create an account here. If you are logged in from this IP address, you will be able to edit. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 16:28, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geolocation says this is probably a dynamic IP, so the person appealing the block was probably on another IP three days ago. The issue is that this IP was used by a long-term abuser of Wikipedia. They had this IP for quite some time and were disrupting Wikipedia as recently as April 3rd, when the current block was issued. I have to agree that the best course of action is to register an account from some other IP address. If you aren't the person the block was targeting you'll be able to edit no problem. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:43, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.