Jump to content

User talk:24.55.33.220

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Germanium, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 00:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Relative abundance of the elements.

[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you editing around the relative abundance of the elements. I just want to point out that this ranking number approach to relative abundance is not scientifically reasonable. Measurements of concentration for less abundant elements are performed on various samples in various locations. Each single measurement can be quite accurate, but each different sample and especially each different location gives wildly different concentration values. Consequently the relative abundance ranking from all sources is meaningless for these less abundant elements. For any of these elements you can say 43rd or 54th or any other number: they don't matter.

If you really think these values are somehow important, please give specific references. Thank you. Johnjbarton (talk) 00:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]