User talk:24.46.59.173

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maine, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022 editing of the 1824 United States Presidential Election

Hello. I'm sending you this message as you have been making edits to the 1824 United States Presidential Election after being told to stop by an admin.I will be reverting the page back to how it was under the Admin's last edit.

If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ HistorianL (talk) 17:58, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Cassiopeia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, California's 53rd congressional district, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cassiopeia talk 00:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 1972 United States presidential election in Minnesota. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 1980 United States presidential election in Georgia, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 1974 United States Senate elections. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 15:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 1964 United States presidential election in Georgia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! I would re-add this in a source. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 23:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will include a citation, too. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to 1964 United States presidential election in Georgia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mr.weedle (talk) 23:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry! 24.46.59.173 (talk) 23:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I reverted your edit on 2008 United States Senate election in Alaska because it didn't seem necessary. While yes, he did not die in office, but it just seemed a bit unnecessary to say. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a question at my talk page. Thank you! Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 21:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, forget this unnecessary thing to say. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 11:11, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 1930 United States House of Representatives elections, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Greetings, Drdpw here. I reverted your edit to Impeachment process against Richard Nixon because the "would have been" detail you have added, 3 times now, is not noteworthy trivia—as the impeachment process did not progress to the trial phase—and, without references, it constitutes original research. Please do not reinsert the statement without including verifiable evidence of its notability from a reliable independent source. Drdpw (talk) 15:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination, you may be blocked from editing. <3 Starchamelix (talk) 20:46, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Clarence Thomas Supreme Court nomination, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I may have added the wrong type of warning previously, sorry for this. Starchamelix (talk) 12:58, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh… I see! 24.46.59.173 (talk) 12:59, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Neils51. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Term limits in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Neils51 (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2008 United States Senate election in Alaska. Curbon7 (talk) 22:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 1973 United States vice presidential confirmation. Raladic (talk) 01:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn’t meant to, because I was removing a roll call vote on both vice presidential nominations. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 01:33, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, because there wasn’t a roll call vote in the U.S. House of Representatives, but there will be no roll call votes very soon, as I will try to re-edit some unexplained content in the future. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But for now, you can make a roll call vote on the House in the both vice-presidential confirmations. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2023

This one is a much better one than than the previous edit on the 2008 Senate election in Alaska, removing and preventing Byrd, Inouye, Leahy, Thurmond, Kennedy, Grassley, and Hatch from being as it would have been the top 8 longest serving senators. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 11:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not; it is also unsourced speculative trivia. Please stop putting such things into or reinserting such things into articles. Drdpw (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I was wrong ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, it is not a much better one than the previous edits, and I will stop putting unsourced trivia. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 19:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24.46.59.173 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can you stop blocking me, please?

Decline reason:

IP is not blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:40, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

24.46.59.173 (talk) 12:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Please stop adding trivia, as in 94th United States Congress. Also, if you think you may have been blocked (as per your edit on 23 June 2023 above), even though you have not been blocked on this IPv4 address, this may be due to appearing with a different IP address at different times. You possibly might find some edits by looking through the history here (IPv6 address range). Ttwaring (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Impeachment process against Richard Nixon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to 2004 United States Senate election in South Dakota. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 🥇ÀvîRâm7^(talk)🩺 11:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Impeachment in the United States. TheBigBookOfNaturalScience 📖 (💬/📜) 00:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Aviram7. An edit you recently made to 1974 United States vice presidential confirmation seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. –––ÀvîRâm7^(talk) 10:16, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Someone on this IP address edited Milward Simpson to include "However, as a U.S. Senator, Simpson was one of six Northerners, the others being Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Norris Cotton of New Hampshire, Bourke B. Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin Mechem of New Mexico, and Robert Byrd of West Virginia to vote against the Civil Rights Act of 1964."

Mechem and Goldwater were born in New Mexico and Arizona respectively and are definitely not "Northerners", and as for Robert Byrd (born in North Carolina), the very first sentence of the WV article is "West Virginia is a state in the Southern United States". Of your last 500 edits, 191 have been reverted. Please take more care. Ttwaring (talk) 15:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2002 United States Senate election in South Carolina, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But, I said that if Thurmond ran for an eighth term and won, then a special election would have held to fill his seat through the remainder of the term, until January 2009. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 13:05, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to fill Wikipedia with "what if?" speculation, despite it being reverted all the time, then that counts as disruptive editing. What if Nixon hadn't resigned? What if Thurmond had lived to 110? Please restrain your desire to add trivia. Ttwaring (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You’re right, that might also prevent anyone from editing. 24.46.59.173 (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2002 United States Senate election in South Carolina. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ttwaring (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.