User talk:24.197.205.83

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ozzie Guillén has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ~ Ameliorate _{U T} @ 04:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanley Kane (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article referenced is an interview with Kane, not in-depth coverage about Kane.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shanley Kane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 24.197.205.83, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shanley Kane has been accepted

Shanley Kane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am replying to the message you left on my talk page here, as since you're an anonymous editor this is the only place you'll see it. I would say the article is marginal in terms of establishing notability, as while she has been featured in numerous articles in reliable publications, none of those publications seem to have felt it appropriate to write a substantial piece about her. By substantial, I mean that the whole article would be about her life, her career, etc. Perhaps there would be a TV documentary about her, or someone would write a book about her. If the publications that are referenced have a paragraph about her that doesn't constitute significant coverage by Wikipedia's measure. If very little has been written about her you'll find it difficult to flesh out the article beyond the current stub. However, taken together, all of the small mentions add up to indicate that she may be notable. We will see whether the article survives or is deleted as the one on Model View Culture was. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.