User talk:24.124.30.198

July 2019

Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from making timeline changes as you did on Blue October, changes to timelines require establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. It has been removed and archived in the page history for now.

Timeline changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created the Blue October timeline. Every piece of information contained within it was entered and formatted by me, and is accurate. There is no point of view, just the facts, which are not disruptive. 24.124.30.198 (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Pecos Valley Southern Railway. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bush (British band). - FlightTime (open channel) 21:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Grunge. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rob van vee 09:11, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spinning the Truth Around (Part I) (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see this guide for adding citations along with the notability guidelines for albums. You may also find Your first article helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spinning the Truth Around (Part I) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been moved to Spinning the Truth Around with better sourcing, with more to come. 24.124.30.198 (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 24.124.30.198! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ladore, Kansas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leonidlednev ( T | C ) 16:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ladore, Kansas, you may be blocked from editing. The person who loves reading (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ladore, Kansas. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 16:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Ladore, Kansas were backed up by a published eye-witness source, the citation was included in the reference. Not vandalism. 24.124.30.198 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Ladore, Kansas.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Zsinj^Talk 17:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the edits you have made on Heat (1995 film) both anonymously and through your Keivspare account. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly conducting the edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you will be blocked from editing. Continuing to re-conduct the edits anonymously rather than using your login does not insulate you from being blocked for WP:3RR and WP:EW. Further activities such as this will result in WP:ANI. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 21:21, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2023

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Greg Proops, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

source: https://www.gregproops.com/blog/new-album-french-drug-deal-drops-september-1st/

November 2023

Hello, I'm Cjse23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Matt Noveskey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.