User talk:21655

Did you read my list of ground rules? Also, if you're reporting a mistake I made, try here.

Did you find my secret star? Go here to claim it!

---

If you're here to complain about a mistake I made, do it here. I don't need my talk page cluttered with one smack with a WikiTrout after another.

---

Now let me get a couple of things straight before you post here:

• I reply on your talk page. To me, that orange bar holds priority over centralization of discussion.
• Unless you'd like a backlash of equal viciousness, be civil. And if it sounds uncivil, then at least acknowledge such.
• Check this page before posting. If any of those meters seems high (and they all will if the occasion arises), think twice.
• I'm not a newcomer, but that doesn't mean you can bite me.

Civility issues aside, post away (but below this line, please, or you get the death penalty)!

re: WP:ADCO

Hi 21655, sure, that'd be fine! (It appears Compwhizii is on break, freeing up my coaching time with him). Perhaps you could let me know what sort of areas you'd like to concentrate on, etc? ~ Riana ⁂ 00:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I have....no clue. Let's start from the beginning? 21655 ^τalk/ _ʃign 14:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I've created a new page at User talk:21655/AC. And don't worry about lack of notification: I've the Watchlist notifier installed in my monobook. 21655 ^τalk/ _ʃign 17:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Whoops

I'm sorry if my edit summary came across as WP:OWN or WP:POV. I was pretty sure Disturbed was alternative metal. Can you point me to the thread stating otherwise? 21655 ^τalk/ _ʃign 17:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries. I want to make it clear to you that we are not determining the genre of the band; the band's sound does that. We are simply discussing which display of genres would be most efficient and bias-free. The discussions have taken place on the talk page and can be found here for the headline, and a little everywhere for the genres (here, for example). If you would like to throw another section in there concerning the genre(s) that should be mentionned in the article, feel free, but remember to use reliable and verifiable sources. I would be glad to take part in the discussion. Have a nice day! Zouavman Le Zouave 19:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

List of films that used LightWave 3D

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of films that used LightWave 3D, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of films that used LightWave 3D. Elfits FOR GREAT JUSTICE (klat) 20:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Heh?

What page are referring to? Mww113 (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah, yes. That was a typo, I had the full ip on mywatchlist but I removed it about an hour ago. Nothing to worry about, It was just that a new user made an edit that you correctly reverted was warned a little to harshly by you. Nothing much but a stern warning as the first item on a new users talkpage might be a little indimidating. In the future, please try to use a basic Welcome to Wikipedia, I reverd your edit, please see the sandbox for all tests, or a simmeler template. Nothing to fret over, just friendly advise =). Mww113 (talk) 23:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:?

Yeah. Your reports at WP:AIV are almost always good, and I have a lot of respect for your work in that area. Where are we going with this? Malinaccier Public (talk) 23:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

...

Wow. You, sir, are some sort of imbecile. How many mistakes have you made today? No wonder that subpage is there. 21655 ^τalk/ _ʃign 15:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey, thanks for this dude. Much appreciated. Tiptoety ^talk 15:57, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (2)

Thanks for recent help and advice (WP:UTM). Much appreciated. Plantsurfer (talk) 08:38, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

vandalism by Hottstuffbaby

see user talk:hottstuffbaby next step? Plantsurfer (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Angry IP user

Hi 21655, thanks for removing the vandalism on my talk page. Apparently some angry 3rd grader thinks I'm a "fuckin faggot" [sic]. It's stuff like this that makes me wonder why we still let anonymous editing here. --Eastlaw (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for your fast revert :). I actually started using Huggle today. Seems like they're after me now because I have a powerful tool ;-). PseudoOne (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello, 21655! A project you are involved in, The WikiCup ,has signed up for automatic message delivery from StormBot, an automated bot account using AutoWikiBrowser. StormBot will be delivering you news and notifications about the project on your talk page. If anything is wrong or you have any suggestions to make, please notify the creator, Stormtracker94. Thank you.

Vandalism Lists

Thought i'd better notify you of this, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Best Vandalism Lists. Since a section of your page is in question as well. Have a nice night TheProf - T / C 22:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, i see you have already removed yours (or had it deleted). I guess mine will go the same way! Killjoys eh! What to do with them? I bet they hate every other aspect of Wikipedia humour as well! Anyway, just ignore me! lol -- Thanks TheProf - T / C 22:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Love the greek ;-) TheProf - T / C 13:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

As far as we're both concerned, the above never happened.

man what? My posts on the discussion page were reverted anyway, and I still don't know why so many apple products have an 'i' in the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.66.153 (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Oh. Ok, then. Yeah, not a vandal, as frustrated as I get with wikipedia sometimes. Moving on, then.

I have an account, but.. ehh. At first it was just laziness and I didn't want to log in to make one passing comment. Also I'm still really annoyed at some of the old webcomic stuff where people's votes to keep articles were discounted because they didn't have enough edits, or only had edits relating to webcomics, or somesuch bull. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.156.66.153 (talk) 15:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Again?!

You absolutely suck at this. Why did you get Huggle anyway? 21655 ^{ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ?} 15:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your tremendous vandal work! Thanks for protecting the integrity of Wikipedia --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'm just getting off now! So I won't be beating you for a while. =) You know I've reverted thousands of vandal work in the past couple of months but you're the only editor (other than vandals) to notice that? Thanks! ----Ðysepsion † ^{Speak your mind} 16:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: You've got (hate) mail

Thanks for the revert, and for the link, if was amusing. IPs do hundreds/thousands of constructive edits everyday, most of which are while the are reading and notice small mistakes in articles I guess, which is incredibly useful. Although much of the vandalism is done by IPs I think that a blanket ban on them would not benefit the encyclopedia (but would cut down on that sort of comment perhaps!) Thanks again. Tiddly-Tom 19:40, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Lawrence_Cohen

Hi, you might want to know that Avruch changed his oppose to a neutral and gave some reasons for his rethink... it might be something you might want to consider since your oppose says "Avruch put it in a way I couldn't phrase any better myself". Hope that is helpful. ++Lar: t/c 12:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC) play runescape!