Jump to content

User talk:208.25.211.33

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add obscenities to Wikipedia as you did to the article RUEHL No.925. Inserting unnecessary swear words, racially or sexually abusive comments, profanity, or provocative pictures to articles or user pages offends many people. It may be seen as vandalism and has been reverted or removed. Thank you. --- Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 23:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Waverly Hills Sanatorium, is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Waverly Hills Sanatorium. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Demographics of Mexico, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Martínez, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

March 2008

[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Biodiesel. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--E8 (talk) 18:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Corrections Corporation of America worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TestEditBot (talk) 20:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at San Bernardino, California, you will be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to White Knight Chronicles, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: White Knight Chronicles was changed by 208.25.211.33 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-10T08:57:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page White Knight Chronicles. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Camw (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Legend of Zelda, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Legend of Zelda was changed by 208.25.211.33 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-27T09:51:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tim Sylvia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drr-darkomen (talk) 22:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christian Ponder, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Christian Ponder was changed by 208.25.211.33 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-10-22T05:19:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page WAC football champions. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 12:37, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of P90X

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is P90X. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P90X (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Broke has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -download ׀ sign! 15:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Millermk. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to The Lonely Island, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Millermk (talk) 06:09, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enterobacteriaceae

[edit]

Are you sure Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a member of Enterobacteriaceae?--Miguelferig (talk) 18:43, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Frosted14. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hugh Beaumont, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  FrostedΔ14  14:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Beaumont. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AP1787 (talk) 21:54, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Pete Rose, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tolly4bolly 17:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm LogX. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sergey Brin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --    L o g  X   15:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bobby Roode because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 18:33, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Maurice Clarett because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kehrbykid. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dinner— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kehrbykid (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Broke because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Palmersville, Tennessee, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dbfirs 16:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to Dilley, Texas appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Mosrod. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to T-Pain— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. MosrodTalk 02:31, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to St. Louis Cardinals has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, 2019 New York Yankees season. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 13:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milwaukee Brewers, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 13:25, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Sample page/39616468, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Passengerpigeon (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]