User talk:207.141.33.19

February 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.141.33.19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with this member. This is a university of Nevada computer and has absolutely nothing to do with a member from the state of Kansas. According to the talk page history, the member making the accusations has a history of making false accusations as well. Please read the talk section of the article Albert Speer and you will see that the member making the accusations just had his false statements called out and is retaliating for it.

I posted a transcript of a war crimes trial where the criminal admits he was guilty. Koffman's talk page history shows that he is obsessed with conspiracy theories which claim Speer did not admit responsibility for the holocaust. For some reason Koffman repeatedly keeps removing Speer's proof of the holocaust. It also shows that Koffman makes false accusations against any member who disagrees with his conspiracy theory.

Here is the court transcript disproving Koffman's claims, and proving that Speer admitted to the holocaust. According to Koffman's talk history he makes repeated false accusations against anyone who points out his conspiracy theory is false.

"The Nuremberg Trial stands for me still today as an attempt to break through to a better world. Still today I acknowledge as generally correct the reasons of my sentence by the International Military Tribunal. Moreover, I still today consider as just that I assume the responsibility and thus the guilt for everything that was perpetrated by way of, generally speaking, crime, after my joining the Hitler Government on the 8th February 1942. Not the individual mistakes, grave as they may be, are burdening my conscience, but my having acted in the leadership. Therefore, I for my person, have in the Nuremberg Trial, confessed to the collective responsibility and I am also maintaining this today still. I still see my main guilt in my having approved of the persecution of the Jews and of the murder of millions of them."

207.141.33.19 (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Bizarre claims of holocaust denial fit in with DbivansMCMLXXXVI. Talk page access revoked to prevent further ranting. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DbivansMCMLXXXVI‎ also has a vendetta against K.e.coffman, so the above further indicates this is the same person. Nick-D (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Thats absolutely not a valid reason for holocaust denial. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Koffman's history of poor behavior is clearly listed in the history of both the article and his user talk page. Anyone can see for themselves. Its public. He has a long history of making false accusations and being warned for vandalizing a significant number of articles (Almost all of which have to do with opponents of Nazi Germany and not actual Nazis)

Someone also reported him for posting a paid review for the very Author who wrote the conspiracy theories he is posting. That is clearly against Wiki guidelines.

Are we supposed to ignore this kind of behavior?

Also, you have accused that other member of being a Nazi sympathizer on his talk history. Are you seriously trying to accuse me of being a Nazi sympathizer because I posted PROOF OF THE HOLOCAUST? That is literally the complete opposite of being a Nazi sympathizer. Do you have any idea how ridiculous that looks?

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

---