User talk:202.177.46.76

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
Hello to Wikipedia team. I want to block one Wikipedia editor "Charlesdrakew". The reason I want to block this Wikipedia user because he/she removes my provided information on a Wikipedia article on General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq. I have tried various times to add General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq's family info but the user "Charlesdrakew" always removes my information even though I am providing proper references. So actually this Wikipedia editor violates the rules and then he warns me that I am violating Wikipedia rules. As far as I know, I have not yet violate any Wikipedia rule. So please help/guide me to edit Wikipedia article and also how could I block this Wikipedia editor. Or if the Wikipedia team could block this editor then there is a request that please block this Wikipedia editor "Charlesdrakew". Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightman.223 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC) October 2011 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dookudu, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dookudu was changed by 202.177.46.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85394 on 2011-10-04T11:01:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:01, 4 October 2011 (UTC) December 2011 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dostana (2008 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dostana (2008 film) was changed by 202.177.46.76 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962953 on 2011-12-16T08:03:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bajaj Pulsar, you may be blocked from editing. Biker Biker (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. February 2012 Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Malayala Manorama. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Cntras (talk) 11:06, 2 February 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Biker Biker (talk) 11:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. "Truth" Hi there! Truth and notability are actually 2 very different things - I suggest a read of both pages. Cheers! Theopolisme 04:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC) September 2012 Hello, I'm Velella. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kavya Madhavan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Velella  Velella Talk   09:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kavya Madhavan. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  Velella  Velella Talk   09:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC) December 2012 Hello, I'm Reaper Eternal. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Symbian seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC) Your submission at AfC Budheisuni was accepted Budheisuni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC) January 2014 Your edits to October 23 Some of your edits on the page October 23 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are: The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page. If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 05:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Saffron terror— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saffron terror with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Saffron terror with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Saffron terror. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Saffron Terror shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Saffron terror, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Indian Super League because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 08:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Craig, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 10:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Technopark, Trivandrum. Materialscientist (talk) 07:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016

Hello, I'm 73.96.114.136. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gandhari (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 73.96.114.136 (talk) 04:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Hinduism in India, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Qzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thalavattam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Qzd (talk) 09:31, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nomination of Dollar (1994 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dollar (1994 film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollar (1994 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

---