User talk:1coolsean

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If it was intended to draft an article please see WP:YFA, WP:AFC. Create a draft via WP:WIZ

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:1coolsean/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:1coolsean/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1coolsean! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 22:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse in this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. David Biddulph (talk) 19:27, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 1coolsean! You created a thread called how to become an editor at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 17:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1coolsean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to help wiki grow and want to add more edits, but I won't do whatever I did wrong again. I am new here and need help, but will improve if you unblock me. PLEASE UNBLOCK ME. I have a page I want to add but I can't because I am blocked, sorry for any inconvenience, bye 1coolsean (talk) 13:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:51, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:1coolsean, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. You must not edit an unblock request after it has been declined. You would need to submit a new unblock request. David Biddulph (talk) 14:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1coolsean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to help wiki grow. I understand what I did wrong, which was very wrong of me. I am so very sorry, please forgive me. If you unblock me I will contribute to wiki, and help people learn. I will me pages and edits good, and not vandalize. I will be a better person. If and when you unblock me I will be so good and help others. I will not do it again. If I get unblock I will start making edits right away. Good ones and will promise to never get blocked again, because of what I did. Thank you for you time, I hope I get unblocked, bye 1coolsean (talk) 18:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking at your short edit history, I see zero edits that give me confidence that you have the required competence to contribute to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank declined unblock requests for currently active blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2019 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed | 1=I want to help wiki grow. I understand what I did wrong, which was very wrong of me. I am so very sorry, please forgive me. If you unblock me I will contribute to wiki, and help people learn. I will me pages and edits good, and not vandalize. I will be a better person. If and when you unblock me I will be so good and help others. I will not do it again. If I get unblock I will start making edits right away. I was only able to make one edit because I was writing one long one as well. I did not get to finish it though because I am blocked. I will not damage Wikipedia again. Good ones and will promise to never get blocked again, because of what I did. Thank you for you time, I hope I get unblocked, bye 1coolsean[reply]