User talk:1bcdbackup

Problems with upload of File:Mario Golf64 UnusedTrack1.ogg

Thanks for uploading File:Mario Golf64 UnusedTrack1.ogg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Meters. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caillou have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Meters (talk) 23:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:CelestialDiablo. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Meters (talk) 23:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Caillou. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Someone's opinion on a blog is not a reliable source. See WP:RS Meters (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs independent reviews to demonstrate notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 1bcdbackup, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wow. You didn't get your article approved, so you just circumnavigated this process and created it yourself. Well... It's out there, and whatever the community decides to do with it is their choice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Joey-Graceffa-Children-of-Eden(2).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Joey-Graceffa-Children-of-Eden(2).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 02:43, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bizaardvark. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 01:46, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017 San Diego Wikiphoto scavenger hunt

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/September 2017 - 1 . RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World

Hello, 1bcdbackup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In Real Life: My Journey to a Pixelated World".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Children of Eden (Joey Graceffa)

Hello, 1bcdbackup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Children of Eden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elites of Eden (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs to satisfy requirements of WP:NBOOK.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elites of Eden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elites of Eden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elites of Eden

Draftspace isn't meant for simply working on "in progress" articles and then moving them yourself as soon as you consider yourself done; it's meant primarily for new editors who haven't earned the privilege of directly creating new pages in mainspace yet, and requires review by established editors before the page can be moved. The fact that it might have slipped through the cracks when you did the same thing in the past doesn't really have any bearing on anything, because administrators can only respond to or fix incidents that they notice.

In reality, you've been around here long enough that you're clearly able to directly create new pages yourself — so you really shouldn't be using draftspace at all, because that's meant for new editors who haven't earned "page creator" rights yet (which is why AFC approval is required). If you want to give yourself time to work on a new article outside of mainspace and then just move it yourself instead of waiting weeks for somebody else to review your work when you consider yourself done, then you should actually use your own sandbox (User:1bcdbackup/sandbox) to do that instead of draftspace. If you use draftspace, then draftspace rules (inclusive of review by an AFC reviewer) apply — established editors aren't necessarily forbidden from doing what you've been doing, but we need to use our own sandboxes, not draftspace, to do it. Bearcat (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for advice!! 1bcdbackup (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Is there any reason why

did you remove the post

that incrediblehulk put — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaysonrivera787321 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmm... I'm sorry, but who are you????1bcdbackup (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry that massege wasn't for you my apologies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaysonrivera787321 (talk • contribs) 06:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's fucking weird. I just came here to warn him that he's risking a block for persistently deleting the same thing I was recently blocked for mistakenly deleting. Anyway, consider yourself warned, 1bcdbackup (if that is your real name). InedibleHulk (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reason you put back the warning JasonRivera878321 removed? I agree it's not right. Users are allowed to delete warnings to save space, doesn't invalidate them. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:28, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I thought it was related to something else, my apologies.1bcdbackup (talk) 06:38, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries on that. Just worry about defying consensus. Personally, I don't think we need to call theories false, but can see why the majority agrees we do. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:58, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm Thomas.W. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Dan Schneider (TV producer) have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. We do not publish mere rumours and speculation in biographies of living persons, not even if it's sourced. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 22:24, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do no WP:EDIT WAR. If you make a change to an article, and another editor disagrees, follow the WP:BRD process by opening a discussion on the Talk page where you can present your position and try to build a new WP:CONSENSUS. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elites of Eden (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add additional independent reliable sources which discuss this book in detail to satisfy the notability guideline for books. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me by clicking here or asking at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elites of Eden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elites of Eden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 04:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Food

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grant success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 09:06, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Note to Self (book) has been accepted

Note to Self (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 02:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

Hello! I, (TheMasterGuru), would like to invite you to join WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:

Writing, cleaning up, and expanding articles about YouTube, in particular, these articles

Putting {{WikiProject YouTube}} on the talk pages of articles involving YouTube, and assessing articles with the template. This helps to categorize articles!

Sourcing BLP's affiliated with YouTube

Updating the project page, and spreading word about the project

and more!

It seems you might be interested, so please stop by! Thank you.

San Diego Wikimedians User Group October 2018 meetup invitation

Who: All members of the public

What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon in Mira Mesa, San Diego.

When: Sunday 7 October 2018, 1:00PM PST / 1300 until 3:00PM PST / 1500

Where: Mira Mesa Branch Library

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.

(Delivered: 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)

Your draft article, Draft:Elites of Eden

Hello, 1bcdbackup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elites of Eden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 09:13, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for a Edit a thon in Chula Vista

Who: All members of the public

What: A Edit a thon in Chula Vista.

When: Sunday 11 November 2018, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:00PM PST / 1600

Where: Chula Vista Public Library Civic Center Branch

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.

The City of Chula Vista Public Library does not advocate nor endorse the views or positions expressed by the users of its facilities.
— Chula Vista Public Library Meeting Room Policy

(Delivered: 21:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1bcdbackup. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 1bcdbackup. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rebels of Eden

Hello, 1bcdbackup,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Rebels of Eden! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This page needs more independent, reliable, secondary sources and has been tagged as such. Thank you for your contribution.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to attend a mini Unconference in Mission Valley

Who: All members of the public

What: San Diego mini Unconference.

When: Sunday 3 February 2019, 6:00PM PST / 1800 until 7:30PM PST / 1930

Where: Starbucks at Fenton Marketplace

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host: RightCowLeftCoast (talk · contribs)

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.

(Delivered: 01:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Temu flag fixes

Hi, I have just posted Talk:Temu (company)#Request for more clean up and removing flag to ask for fixes to the page about Temu (company) that should address the final issues raised in a flag for the page. I have a conflict of interest as an employee of Temu. I want to follow the correct process for COI users. Since you are a member of the WikiProject for Internet Culture, which is relevant to the page, I thought you possibly be interested in reviewing the proposal. Temu’s app has been the most downloaded phone app in the United States in recent months. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Snowy2000 (talk) 03:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question about your contributions

Greetings, 1bcdbackup. In case you are earning money for any of your contributions to Wikipedia, you should be aware of the relevant policy and follow it. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 13:26, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]