User talk:1a2e3e

This is 1a2e3e's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academies at Englewood (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by William2001 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While high schools often meet the notability guidelines, please add more independent sources with significant coverage of this topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academies at Englewood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Academies at Englewood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

William2001^(talk) 04:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1a2e3e! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! William2001^(talk) 04:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academies at Englewood (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by John from Idegon were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a notable subject and should have an encyclopedia article. This is not an encyclopedia article. Not even close. This reads like copy for the school's website. You basically have to start over. Please look at some other school articles. You'll find a list of good and featured articles at WP:WPSCH. Please read the basic instructions for creating your first article at WP:YFA. Similar articles have style guides. The school article guidelines are found at WP:SCH/AG. The one big problem here is the sourcing. Pretty much, don't use the school, the school district or any activities websites associated with the school. An encyclopedia article is tertiary. That means, strangely enough, that we are not writing about the school, we are writing about what others have written about the school in reliable secondary sources. Please try again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academies at Englewood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Academies at Englewood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academies at Englewood (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by John from Idegon were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not resubmit until you've corrected the problems identified. All of them. Continuing to resubmit without even attempting to address the identified issues is disruptive. There is nothing whatsoever acceptable about this draft. You need to start over, paraphrasing ALL your content from reliable secondary sources. What is your connection to this institution?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academies at Englewood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Academies at Englewood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 05:28, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academies at Englewood (January 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by John from Idegon was: The content of this draft is better covered as it is now, at Dwight Morrow High School

John from Idegon (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello 1a2e3e. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Academies at Englewood, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:1a2e3e. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=1a2e3e|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 02:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to read WP:Communication is required. John from Idegon (talk) 02:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reply

Hello to John from Idegon: I, (1a2e3e) find your previous comments hurtful and irrelevant. Firstly, I would like to make something very clear: I m not paid to edit or create the article I have proposed. I have created the article after doing research on the topic and consulting the administration of the school for a review of certain facts. I am not attempting to promote or advertise the organization in any way, but if you feel so, any helpful suggestions or advice will be greatly appreciated. I have looked at your user page as well, and I find that after being such an experienced editor you're comments are still so attacking, non-helpful, and dismissive to a new editor/author like me. The topic I choose to write about clearly deserves attention; even you said so earlier. again, it would be helpful if you could advise me what to do or how to improve the article so can rightfully contribute this topic to the encyclopedi. Thanks.

Follow WP:TPG. So, we have above your admission of a WP:COI. Procede according to the best practices outlined there. This potential article has been rejected. The school's administration has no say in the content of the article nor do the students. If you wish to split this content off from the existing article it will require you to reach a consensus to do so at that article. Any further edits to the draft will be considered disruptive and will be referred for discipline. You seem to have some ridiculous notion that this article is for or under the control of the school. It isn't. It is specifically not for the promotion of the subject. You were advised multiple times to start over. Explain why you didn't. Those of us who volunteer to help those making new articles aren't doing it to hear themselves talk. You've ignored every single piece of advice given you and you have the unmitigated gall to say that somehow being advised you're doing it wrong is somehow hurtful? Sorry, couldn't care less. Are you 13? You're acting like it. Children are allowed to edit here if they can purport themselves maturely. Perhaps you should try it. John from Idegon (talk) 03:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Academies at Englewood (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Academies at Englewood and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Academies at Englewood, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Academies at Englewood

Hello, 1a2e3e. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Academies at Englewood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]