User talk:1StrangerSC
May 2012
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheeseburger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cheeseburger was changed by 1StrangerSC (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950131 on 2012-05-12T20:57:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:57, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
A bottle of champagne for you!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Champagne_flute_and_bottle.jpg/100px-Champagne_flute_and_bottle.jpg)
Here's to all the hard work put into the maternal sensitivity page! R-Bot6 (talk) 06:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Maternal sensitivity
[edit]![]() | On 18 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maternal sensitivity, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that children of maternally sensitive mothers scored higher in math and phoneme knowledge than those who had a history of lower maternal sensitivity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maternal sensitivity. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Your work is also featured on The Star! Congrats! --PFHLai (talk) 03:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar award
[edit]![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your work on improving the Maternal sensitivity article, alongside users Carina1205 and R-Bot6, I award you this Teamwork Barnstar and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. SilverserenC 09:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC) |
Some bubble tea for you!
[edit]![]() |
:D awesome! Khyati Gupta (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SarahStierch (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Fundamental assessment
[edit]I came across your article Fundamental assessment while trying to clean up links to disambiguation pages. Unfortunately, I have to admit that the subject of "Fundamental assessment" is way out of my comfort zone. In plain English: I don't have a clue how to solve the links. Could you take another look at the article and set the links to the right article instead of to disambiguation pages? Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 14:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)