Jump to content

User talk:190.167.27.164

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not WP:EDIT WAR. Instead, if you have questions, please open a discussion on the relevant article's Talk page. -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@190.167.27.164: You might be right about your edit but not for the reason in your edit summary. At any rate, you will be blocked if there is any more edit warring, and that will apply for every new IP that turns up. As well as editing, it is necessary to collaborate with other editors and that means you have to start an article talk page discussion to explain your position. Johnuniq (talk) 01:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. I have opened a thread on the article’s talk page for you to discuss the matter. - SchroCat (talk) 02:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]