User talk:185.104.136.59

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

185.104.136.59 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Promotion / advertising-only account: edit-warring across multiple accounts"? That is not in any way true.185.104.136.59 (talk) 15:40, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The personal attacks in your summaries are sufficient to keep you blocked and talk page access removed. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The "Promotion / Advertising-only" tag was a mistake on my part that I've fixed. You are edit warring [1] from multiple IPs in this range. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, I'm Ae245. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to David Vitty seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ae245 (talk) 07:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

@Ae245 no idea who that is, I didn't make the edit in question 92.40.198.11 (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---