User talk:182.186.108.113

July 2020

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

182.186.108.113 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked unjustly. In fact it is User:Kautilya3 that has been making constant disruptive reverts single handedly to the productive work of all other editors. Here can be seen how this user Kautilya3 has recently made destructive revert to productive edit, once again. But nobody noticing? 182.186.108.113 (talk) 14:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request essentially entirely talks about the actions of others. Therefore, there are no grounds to consider lifting the block. WP:GAB explains how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't talk about others. Though this may not be the place to report users but the user I talked about made destructive reverts to my contribution because of which I was blocked. See here.
--- 182.186.108.113 (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP, you have a choice: you can either continue to blame others, or you can accept that your edits were disruptive. If you choose the first, nothing here is going to change, though your block may be lengthened. Drmies (talk) 15:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, a restriction can not overwhelm the truth. Now at one side there is an IP and on the other side is the whole threatening mafia. This is evident from the history of that page that I contributed productively. Thanks for your review and having time to block me. 182.186.108.113 (talk) 15:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You're welcome; call on me any time. Drmies (talk) 15:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appealing a block for edit warring

I'll just leave this here for your ponderment, even though there is no current unblock request.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Deepfriedokra, Thank you for your advice, explaination and especially I respect you for your devotion toward Wikipedia. Your assistance has really helped me get myself acquainted with the edit strategies and coping with the consequences when someone reverts edits. I'm reading further about wiki policies and editing guidlines. I've bookmarked you for future negotiations, and I really liked that you all came here. Regards. 182.186.108.113 (talk) 05:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You know what also helps? Not referring to other editors as a "threatening mafia". Drmies (talk) 12:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.