User talk:17inchcanvas

A page you started (Anindita Paul) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anindita Paul, 17inchcanvas!

Wikipedia editor Daniel kenneth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your contributions

To reply, leave a comment on Daniel kenneth's talk page.

Applicable guidelines

Hi. I removed all those YouTube links and reformatted the section titles of Anindita Paul because the links violated Wikipedia guidelines (see WP:External links). Wikipedia is not a directory (see WP:What Wikipedia is not) leading to all of a person's works online. Also, WP:TITLEFORMAT calls for article and section titles to use ordinary sentence casing, without most of the words capitalized as one finds in the conventions followed in other places.

Therefore, when you restored all the YouTube links and added all the capital letters back to the titles, I reverted your changes. Largoplazo (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've also just been through the article neutralizing the language. Wikipedia articles are written from a neutral point of view, not like a fan site. They aren't filled with expressions of glorification and admiration. They avoid peacock language, like telling us how renowned and prestigious and popular everybody is. Also, they don't act as a means through which their subjects communicate their own feelings, dreams, motivations, etc. These are unknowable, other than by what the subjects themselves claim. They cannot be externally observed and verified, and they aren't factual information about the person as discernible from the point of view of others. Largoplazo (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: How do I cite Newspaper Interview which was published in major Newspapers and don't have any online version.

You can use the {{cite news}} template, between <ref></ref> tags. However, keep in mind that anything that she herself has said in an interview is still not necessarily reliable—it isn't as though people don't weave stories around their origins—and that she is a primary source, not an independent reliable source. I mean, if she says "I went to X school", that's probably acceptable, but if she says, "Oh, this producer just raved and raved about how wonderful my performance was", well, maybe he did or maybe she's just remembering it that way or wants us to think that. Largoplazo (talk) 13:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft.

I deleted your article because

it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Most of your text was unsourced or sourced to Kher talking about himself, you need genuinely independent third party sources
There is nothing in your text to tell us why it meets the notability criteria, to show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

You even include a promotional comment in your article title!
Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: The institute’s alumni include popular Bollywood actors... to name a few. Global celebrities such as Oscar winners... the second largest network in the world... prominent international projects... The intensive professional-level courses provide specialised training in Acting and Screenwriting. The school offers a three-month long intensive, full-time professional-level diploma, as well as month-long evening Certificate programmes in acting. The courses impart training in acting, body movement, diction and voice modulation. Diploma students receive individual guidance and counselling from Anupam Kher throughout the programme. The institute also provides weekend and advanced weekend courses that not only help students to build the foundation of their acting skills and learn the basic techniques, but also to sharpen it further. — and so on. In fact the whole "Courses" section seems to have little purpose beyond promoting. And they are "offered", not "sold"!
Misused capitals and bolding to make sure we didn't miss any of the promotion, although this was removed by later editors. Examples include ACTOR PREPARES has expanded... The Anupam Kher Show - Kucch Bhi Ho Sakta Hai... Khwaabon Ki Zamin Par... began telecast on Zindagi in October 2016.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chargesheet: The Shutterlock Murder

A tag has been placed on Chargesheet: The Shutterlock Murder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Chargesheet: The Shutterlock Murder" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chargesheet: The Shutterlock Murder. Since you had some involvement with the Chargesheet: The Shutterlock Murder redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickky Idnaani (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As an example, we are told: In his impressionable years, Idnaani was influenced by the work of French photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson and Indian lensman Suresh Natarajan. He admires the work of painter Raja Ravi Verma. Idnaani’s technical finesse and his nose-to-the-grindstone approach has helped him create a niche for himself. Not sure why people's names are italicized; but far more importantly the only source provided (this one) (i) doesn't even pretend to back up any of that (instead, it's as shallow as suggested by its title: "Barbie feet is the latest viral pose: Celebs like Bella Hadid, Kendall Jenner and Kourtney Kardashian clearly endorse it"), and (ii) is by the subject himself, and therefore would be unusable even if it did say something relevant. Provide reliable sources, and use them honestly, please. And make sure that they provide evidence for the subject's notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 17inchcanvas! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 09:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickky Idnaani (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickky Idnaani (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Quote: Idnaani has done photo sessions for magazines like Femina, Filmfare, Society, Savvy and Stardust. The names of the film stars he has captured with his camera include Amitabh Bachchan, Akshay Kumar, Ayushmann Khurrana, Ekta Kapoor, Hrithik Roshan, Irrfan Khan, Priyanka Chopra, Saif Ali Khan, Shahid Kapoor, Shraddha Kapoor, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Naseeruddin Shah, Tabu, Vidya Balan and Mrunal Thakur These two lists come with one reference. Does the source back them up? No it does not: It merely includes a photo of Mrunal Thakur that's credited to Idnaani. So by a crude estimate, 95% of this paragraph is unreferenced. And it's just the first paragraph that I happened to look at. ¶ More importantly, you have to make the draft demonstrate that he meets either WP:ARTIST or, more generally, WP:PERSON. As long as the draft fails to do this, it won't become an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 22:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vickky Idnaani (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vickky Idnaani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 07:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vickky Idnaani

Hello, 17inchcanvas. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vickky Idnaani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vickky Idnaani

Hello, 17inchcanvas. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vickky Idnaani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:13, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]