User talk:178.51.64.144

Please note that per your edit summary:

Scottish is only used when the person is born to two Scots.

Incorrect. You just need to be born in Scotland regardless of where your parents were born.

As she is half Filipina, she cannot be pure Scottish but British.

Incorrect. She was born in Scotland. There is no such thing as pure Scottish.

Many natives consider half breeds as British

Here in the UK your use of the phrase half breeds is consider offensive. Please don't use this language again.

I am a Scottish born UK citizen. Sciencefish (talk) 13:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry to offend you, but the “identity thing” in Great Britain is a controversial issue to me.

I consider it a strict rule, especially for women. If a Scottish woman marries a non-Scottish man, her children will cease to be to be Scottish and will be called “British” instead. There are many “British” people in Scotland (southern part) because they don’t have Scottish ancestry or are born in England or Wales.

Even for Scottish men -although it’s more common to intermarry- it's usually frowned upon to intermarry, especially in rural areas, and I don't support it either because children pick up a lot from their mother. Because of the high divorce rate, children will be more “British”.

Moreover, how can half breeds identify as Scottish by other Scots surrounding them? Scotland has a different culture compared to England, especially when it comes to languages (Scots and Scottish Gaelic) or religion (Church of Scotland) for example. The same goes for Wales. Moreover, Scotland is not independent yet and it will never happen.

”I am a Scottish born UK citizen”

Aren’t you Filipino or American by any chance because of how active you are with editing on pageant pages? If you have proof, please put it on your profile.

Your sentence on using foul language makes no sense as I don’t use offensive language at all. Thank you. 178.51.64.144 (talk) 10:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense. And yes, "half breed" is both offensive and bigoted, as is you insistence on imaginary purity. If you do this again you will lose editing privileges. And no, you may not demand that other editors tell you anything of the kind or be disqualified for not agreeing with you. Acroterion (talk) 19:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“And yes, "half breed" is both offensive and bigoted, as is you insistence on imaginary purity.”

Nope, it’s an opinion, not “nonsense”. I, as a Scot would never accept intermarriages, neither with other white British nor Americans like you, I’m very traditional. Say what you want, I personally don’t care, my point still stands. 178.51.64.144 (talk) 20:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should also be aware that Wikipedia style is to identify the person's nationality in the lead sentence, not their ethnicity. Schazjmd (talk) 19:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So? A half Filipino is not Scottish, the person is either British or simply Filipino. In the Philippines Christina Chalk passes as a Filipina.178.51.64.144 (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish people aren't a distinct group. They are the children left over from Vikings killing off the men who used to populate the isles and abandoning the women once their raids were returning home. Lets call them vikingettes, as they aren't pure viking. 12.74.53.1 (talk) 21:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep using this page as a soapbox for your personal views on racial purity and language, and sexism ("especially women") you'll lose access to it entirely. Acroterion (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 178.51.64.144 (talk) 22:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid yankee you are, go back to school, follow etiquette classes and educate yourself. My point still stands! 178.51.64.144 (talk) 22:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LONG LIVE DONALD TRUMP!!! 178.51.64.144 (talk) 22:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. QwertyForest (talk) 20:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Due to your ongoin remarks I have blocked your access to this talk page. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.