Jump to content

User talk:174.67.122.2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia is not Microsoft support

[edit]

That information on Office 2013 issues is unnecessary and unencyclopedic. New software has bugs, we're not here to inform people of them in that particular manner. ViperSnake151  Talk  17:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Microsoft Office 2013 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:174.67.122.2 reported by User:ViperSnake151 (Result: ). Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Microsoft Office 2013. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Now you had several edit's revert your addition. I hope you understand why we do not include bug reports like this. If not, feel free to drop me a line. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:51, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.