User talk:173.52.38.97

I didn't do anything.

Speedy deletion contested: Dan Fishback

Hello 173.52.38.97. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Dan Fishback, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not promostuff.Claims significance.Take it to AFD, per your wishes. Thank you. Winged Blades^Godric 02:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

American Flagg!

An RfC has begun at Talk:American Flagg!. You can't edit the article while an RfC is going on. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in an edit summary, and at your registered-name talk page, we do not edit the article when an RfC is ongoing. If you do so again, an ANI will be opened about your behavior. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will not do it again

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Huon (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand what I did wrong but I promise not to do whatever is was again.

Decline reason:

You realise the inherent logical fallacy in that, right? Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:31, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this means you are promising not to edit from this IP address but only after signing in with your account, so are actually asking that the block not be lifted. --Yamla (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

well, I don't understand. Your are very confusing. I can only post from this IP address because this is where the computer is.

You are believed to be the person behind Mrbrklyn (talk · contribs) and the related accounts. You need to address this in your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, but I am still not sure what to do. I said I wasn't Mrbklyn and they said I had to apologize for being Mrbrklyn. So I did that as well. Those are the only two choices. I promise I will never ever be Mrbrklyn, and all the times I was Mrbrklyn before, I apologize for that. And when I see a Mrbrklyn, I will stay away from him (if it is a him), because he must be bad and I don't want to be someone like that or know anyone like that.

{{unblock|reason=

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

thank you, but I am still not sure what to do. I said I wasn't Mrbklyn and they said I had to apologize for being Mrbrklyn. So I did that as well. Those are the only two choices. I promise I will never ever be Mrbrklyn, and all the times I was Mrbrklyn before, I apologize for that. And when I see a Mrbrklyn, I will stay away from him (if it is a him), because he must be bad and I don't want to be someone like that or know anyone like that.

Decline reason:

Procedural close - the unblock template is not a reply button, and multiple requests will not speed up your appeal (or notify anyone) in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So you are saying there is no means to appeal

Decline reason:

Apply on your account talk page. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:14, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Which page is that? I don't have an account.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

173.52.38.97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason I have nothing to do with this. Unblock me

Decline reason:

We don't believe you. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.