User talk:1635schl

Welcome!

Hello, 1635schl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Will Beback talk 08:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sugar2210 Sugar2210 (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brickbat Revue

The article Brickbat Revue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable broadsheet lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brickbat Revue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brickbat Revue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brickbat Revue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 19:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mark Steven Greenfield

I've moved the article from it's sandbox location into a correct spot for review at Articles for Creation. Sorry for the dleay, hopefully it will be reviewed in the next several days. --j⚛e decker ^talk 05:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Steven Greenfield has been accepted

Mark Steven Greenfield, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]