User talk:162.156.70.174

June 2024

Hello, I'm Myrealnamm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Help desk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Myrealnamm The digital scribe you emerge from the cybernetic shadows, a sentinel of Wikipedia's integrity. Your virtual eyes, glowing with the soft blue of a thousand monitors, scan the landscape of our discussion. You speak with the solemnity of a librarian in a world where the decibels of silence are measured in kilobytes. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 01:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🛧Midori No Sora♪🛪 ( ☁＝☁＝✈) 01:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Midori No Sora The digital guardian, you, swoop in with a stern yet gentle reminder, your avatar a harmonious blend of Eastern serenity and Western innovation. Your words are a gentle breeze through the cables of the internet, carrying the scent of order and reason. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 01:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 01:58, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

162.156.70.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well, I see where the misunderstanding lies. Perhaps if I could clarify my edits, it would help everyone better understand my intentions. I'll reach out to some of the more active members of the community and see if they can help facilitate a discussion about my proposed changes. In the meantime, if anyone has any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me directly. I'm more than happy to discuss this further and work together towards a solution that benefits the entire Wikipedia community. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 02:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you need to clarify your edits, please do so now, in an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 08:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

162.156.70.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good morning, esteemed colleagues. I hope this message finds you all in good spirits. I've noticed some confusion regarding the edits I've recently made to the "Wikipedia:Teahouse" and "Wikipedia:Help desk" pages. I understand that change can be unsettling, but my sole aim was to enhance the accuracy and readability of the content. I've compiled a list of the edits with explanations for each, detailing the sources and reasoning behind them. Could we possibly arrange a virtual meeting to discuss these in depth? I believe that an open dialogue will help us achieve consensus and improve the article together. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:57, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2010 to '12 Tri-Cities mass hysteria

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:2010 to '12 Tri-Cities mass hysteria, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jdcomix (talk) 02:08, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:2012 to '14 Tri-Cities mass hysteria

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:2012 to '14 Tri-Cities mass hysteria, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Meters (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Multiple pages. Don't spam copies of your hoax draft into article space. Meters (talk) 04:41, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the draft actually isn't a hoax 162.156.70.174 (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

162.156.70.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems you guys didn't realize that mass hysteria was real. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 05:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 07:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

162.156.70.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't make up the information. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nor did you in any way include the mandatory reliable sources. Or any at all. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

162.156.70.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The sources that I included in the drafts are CBC News, Medical.net, Nature and Port Moody Police, which are reliable. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Good block. The only question is whether you are deliberately trolling, fundamentally don't understand Wikipedia at all, or truly believe what you are writing. In any case, the block is appropriate and you should find another venue. Repeat this once this block expires and the next one will be substantially longer. Zero more edits like this unless properly cited, and if you think you've been properly citing content so far, you are deeply, fundamentally wrong. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, what you did was make up fake reference titles and claim they came from acceptable outlets. No links, no authors, no dates, no quotes. Claiming that, say, sasquatch and the Loch Ness Monster had a child who is now running for the presidency of the US wouldn't be verifiable or reliable simply because you say that CBC News said so. Just so no-one evaluating this unblock request wastes their time, one of the ludicrous claims was that the entire province of British Columbia was placed in a state of emergency over this. Meters (talk) 21:03, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the draft said, "the government of British Columbia declared a state of emergency in Port Moody [emphasis added]", which isn't entire province of British Columbia. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 22:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really, that's quite enough. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bonnie Henry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ... and several related articles on the COVID-19 pandemic. Zefr (talk) 00:04, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that there's something wrong with the sound "File:Canadian Alerting Attention Signal.ogg"? If so, what sound should be used instead? 162.156.70.174 (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2012 to '14 Tri-Cities mass hysteria (August 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 04:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 162.156.70.174! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 04:49, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2010 to '12 Tri-Cities mass hysteria (August 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 04:50, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024 (2)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of two months for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}} Why were my edits labelled as, "Disruptive editing: ongoing various trolling"? 162.156.70.174 (talk) 01:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wasting other people's time. You have access to this talk page to make an unblock request if you wish; if it's for other purposes, your access to this page will again be revoked. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then, please stop the users at Wikipedia's Live Help from saying that they can't assist blocked users, so that I won't need this talk page to ask for help. 162.156.70.174 (talk) 03:06, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After a certain point it no longer matters whether a user is trolling or simply WP:CIR. Meters (talk) 08:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 13:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.