Jump to content

User talk:151.67.87.5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


June 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:AlasdairGreen27, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Monster Under Your Bed (talk 2 me) 11:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:DIREKTOR. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Have you got a hidden agenda against those editors? Monster Under Your Bed (talk 2 me) 11:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Oh yes, he has an agenda, but its not exactly "hidden". He's another IP of banned User:PIO, a known and "active" sockpuppeteer who's most recent sockpuppet (User:Luigi 28) has been banned by the efforts of User:AlasdairGreen27 and myself. He's angry and is using this IP as a means of "revenge". It would be advisable to block, he's been at this for months he's not about to stop now (see Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PIO (3rd)). --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to User:Kubura. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Come now PIO, this is childish. Your attempts are completely obvious and easily detectable because of your radical POV. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]