Jump to content

User talk:151.16.75.72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2010

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Elia Pirone. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Shadowjams (talk) 09:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
The other person involved in the edit war is clearly a provocateur. You should stop him! --151.16.75.72 (talk) 09:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|If the other person agrees to arise with respect, instead of provocation, I am willing to talk.}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

151.16.75.72 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If the other person agrees to arise with respect, instead of provocation, I am willing to talk.

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. This block is about your actions (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.