User talk:132Lemons132

Stop changing the plot of Miraculous

I don't want to sound rude or anything, but the reason why I and others keep removing your changes is because it doesn't sound appropriate for Wikipedia, even if you think it is better. First of all, from a writing perspective, it doesn't sound like the formal tone of an encyclopedia or textbook. Secondly, it contains too much information. These Wikipedia pages are for people who are not fans of Miraculous and want to know more about the show. They don't need to know how Cat Noir felt about Cataclysming Monarch, just the fact that he scarred him, because that's the only thing important for the plot. Lastly, even though the plot contains substantial descriptions about the characters, just like any well-written Wikipedia plot summary, there is no need to call it "Plot and Characters". That's just how Wikipedia standards work. I hope you understand. Miracusaurs (talk) 02:38, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i will change it back to how it was but I would only argue to keep the "Story" Heading. Anyways, I have changed back to the edit you made a couple of days ago thank you I will leave this Miraculous Ladybug article to you...Keep it coming. Goodbye! 132Lemons132 (talk) 12:06, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

chilll out 132Lemons132 (talk) 17:23, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum

there was draft of Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum by --Sunuraju (talk) 11:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello 132Lemons132. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:132Lemons132. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=132Lemons132|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 13:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i dont want money i just want to edit dude. - im not being compensated kay? 132Lemons132 (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just like the drama, I am not being compensated or anything! 132Lemons132 (talk) 19:39, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]