User talk:12rp5b605gba2011-2012

March 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Aaron Ledgister. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 23:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Chez Isaac. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Chez Isaac. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Total-MAdMaN (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Britt Assombalonga

The article Britt Assombalonga has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Britt Assombalonga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Britt Assombalonga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britt Assombalonga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:51, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of 10alatham (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SmartSE (talk) 20:58, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]