User talk:12bogdanicha

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for as all your edits were just provocative trolling and imitation a 11-year old children.. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Duja► 14:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me please,i don't understand.....

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12bogdanicha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me please, i don't even understand why you blocked me in the first palce, i was simply using my talk page.. it wasn't in an unreasonable manner and i am disgraced by what wikipedia has done to me. Please unblock me, i am not a bad person and i simply use wikipedia to research things that i would like to or need ot know about and i use my talk page resonably and in a good way.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a social networking site, the block does not prevent you reading articles and doing your research. --pgk 11:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you don't seem to understand the simple language above "This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request." and since you seem to now wish not to be unblocked, I have protected this page from further editing. --pgk 19:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]