Jump to content

User talk:12345ka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 12345ka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Watchdogb 21:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC) PS. Good detective work also :)Watchdogb 21:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome, 12345ka! I noticed that you joined the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State terrorism in Sri Lanka (Second nomination). Participation in the community is encouraged, of course, but your status as a brand new user means that your opinions might not be counted. Please understand that this is a common practice on Wikipedia, and it is necessary to prevent deliberate misuse of our discussion pages. Our discussion processes value consensus over raw numbers and reasoned debate over simple voting. However, please do make further contributions to Wikipedia and express your opinion on policy matters.

--♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 08:28, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Striking your vote

[edit]

Someone has striken your vote in the AFD. If it is you then my apologies, if not make sure your vote countsTaprobanus 16:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the branstar

[edit]

Thank you very much and I hope you will keep editing wikipedia. -watchdogb

Expulsion of Tamils from Colombo

[edit]

Question, hi i was wondering where Alleged Ethnic Clensing by GoSL should be added, even Reuters [1] BBC [2] questions if it is ethnic cleansing so there are enough RS to add it and i dont want edit wars from hardliners. Thanks. --12345ka 10:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If there is sources from neutral site you should add them to State terrorism when it becomes unprotected. It would be a good Idea to finish the writing (on your sandbox/your computer) for now and once the State terrorism article becomes unprotcted you can just past it on there. Keep up the good work Watchdogb 13:46, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
see this for a neutral title and see this for some other sources. Infact we have a HR organization calling it ethnic cleansing. So we can write a neutral article with attribution to ethnic cleanzing from the organization with a neutral title. Thanks Taprobanus 20:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Look at expulsion of Muslims and other ethnic cleansing articles as a model such as Expulsion of Poles by Germany (there are many like it, if you check under Ethnic Cleansing to write that article about Expulsion of Tamils from Colombo article, you dont have to add to State terrorim unless someone calls it later as state terrorism. JMHO21:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I made a stup and I hope you can expand it (since you did give me the idea :) ) Expulsion_of_Tamils_from_Colombo. Thanks Watchdogb 01:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Please take a look atthis. There is a lot of neutral work to be done about masscres, murders, rapes etc etc. I have some sources here.Thanks Taprobanus 15:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

12345ka (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

since i opened my account none of the around 50 edits have been vandalism or uncivil, including some very useful contributions. looking at my contributions if there is a valid reason i wouldn't mind being blocked, please look through them, I dont think i deserve to be blocked. thanks

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for vandalism, but for violating WP:SOCK as a sockpuppet of indefinitely blocked user 12345ak - auburnpilot talk 00:42, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.