User talk:1213energystar

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 07:49, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Both of your edits are not only inappropriate, they are to unrelated articles and revert the same editor. I suggest you read WP:HOUND. If this behavior continues I will block you. Dougweller (talk) 07:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is obvious tendentious editing. You've targetted an editor and reverted them on unrelated articles with no explanation, and after my warning you reverted me, again with no explanation. Do it again and I'll block you. Dougweller (talk) 10:01, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

If you have a problem with me, please let me know what it is. Randomly reverting my edits doesn't let me know what the problem is. It isn't a good use of your time, or of that of others who have to clean up after you. Ground Zero | t 12:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 11:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1213energystar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here 1213energystar (talk) 07:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Rs chen 7754 07:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.