User talk:114514politics
July 2023
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:42, 31 July 2023 (UTC) |
114514politics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I only used a proxy because I am out of my home and don't want to show my address before I can return safely. My edit to wiki pages did not result in a block, it was the edites on a talk page that result in a block because they say I were someone else but I am not which can also be seen on the talk page where that blocked account always replied angrily and just can't talk with anyone politely while I always talk politely. If unblocked I won't edit the pages about Michigan politics anymore to prevent sockpuppetry suspicion and instead re-begin my project to add district-level results of statewide elections with 2022-32 congressional district lines in other states.Also, the sockpuppetry investigation accuse me of "disruption at the Slotkin article" while I never edited Elissa Slotkin page by myself and only suggested contents on its talk page politely.114514politics (talk)
Decline reason:
I don't really know what you're talking about. You're writing in a stream-of-consciousness manner that is very difficult to understand. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
114514politics (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Since NinjaRobotPirate say I wrote my appeal in a stream-of-consciousness manner that is very difficult to understand.I heed to rewrite it in an easier to understand manner: I were blocked due to be seen as sockpuppet of Thespeedoflightnenerchanges, but the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thespeedoflightneverchanges in fact do not show I were him,The checkuser did not draw the conclusion that we were the same user and it did not give clear no only because I used proxy to hide where I am until I come back to home safely. Then ScottishFinnishRadish still judge me as sockpuppet by claiming I made "Similar disruption at the Slotkin article." while I have never edited the page itself and though we both edited its talk page our edits were in different manner, that blocked account always replied angrily and just can't talk with anyone politely while I always talk politely,he also won't accept any compromise including the compromise that rename "LGBT" section as "Flag" that I agreed on. The way I edit its talk page to give suggestions, provide new sources and actively seeking common ground between different sides is also far from "disruption" that I was accused of.So I think there were no enough proof to say I am that Thespeedoflightnenerchanges guy. If unblocked I won't edit the pages about Michigan politics anymore to prevent sockpuppetry suspicion and instead re-begin my project to add district-level results of statewide elections with 2022-32 congressional district lines in other states.
Decline reason:
"Inconclusive" means inconclusive, not exonerated. There was considerable behavioral evidence that you are a sockpuppet, supplemented by CU findings that, while not confirming it, noted several suspicious details. Looking at the behavioral evidence myself, I concur in ScottishFinnishRadish' conclusion that you are a sockpuppet based on a standard of clear and convincing evidence.
Incidentally, your username appears to reference a pornographic term; that would have to change before any unblock. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 17:44, 5 August 2023 (UTC) )
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)