User talk:103.156.18.119

June 2022

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to India Post Payments Bank. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Blanchey (talk) 11:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it may not be a correct way to put the fact.

You and your so called liberal progressive friends write so much wrong contents and saying the fact a joke.

You are talking about joke, so I am mentioning this.

Is it not a joke when your leftist friend said Ayurveda as a fake practice ? Is it serious if it is done by a so called progressive guy ?

OK. NP. 103.156.18.119 (talk) 11:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I don’t care about what the article is about, there is a Manual of style which should be followed and deviating from this makes it harder for our readers to read. Please keep this in mind for the future. Thank you Blanchey (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Blanchey what do you mean by "this makes it harder for our readers to read" ?

The thing here is not whether the information is harder to read or easier to read. The main matter is we should put the correct and true information.

Your so called progressive friends write the fake/false information and moderators like you are happily endorsing it and make it non editable for the common users. But, a common reader/user shares some information you guys put lots of rules.

@Blanchey Can you give me one reason for this so called partiality/bias ? 103.156.18.119 (talk) 04:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the information was correct, then it’s fine if you re add it. Now that I have read it properly it seems as though I have made a mistake, and I apologise. When I was reverting it looked like it was a joke but when I read that version of the article it made sense. I will remove my messages from this page if you want Blanchey (talk) 06:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blanchey I have tried to add all the conversation, you can go through all of this once if you want. 103.156.18.119 (talk) 10:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Blanchey why are you removing it now ? You should and must keep those messages.

@Blanchey It should be a lesson to your so called progressive liberal Rationalist (not scolding) mentality friends who are continuously spreading false/fake information via this wonderful platform and you and the moderators like you who endorse their views without verifying it.

You said so many big big things and behaved in a very rude way, now after understanding it had no false information, you are removing your message. I think you want to hide your mistakes, that's why you have removed your messages.

Anyways, I hope you will not repeat this in future, please change your behaviour towards normal editors.

The reason I suggested I removed the message was because it was in hindsight incorrect and could make you look bad, it was nothing about me hiding my mistakes as I will openly admit that I made a mistake. I am very sorry if I upset you, it was never my intention to do so. I am only human so I do make mistakes at times, and I’m sure many others do as well. Also, that message I left was generic, I didn’t write it. If you want to say anything else, please do reply and I would be happy to assist. Blanchey (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at India Post Payments Bank, you may be blocked from editing. Deliberately obfuscating your edits with summaries like this is not OK. Toddst1 (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.