User talk:1,300 volts

February 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sigma Chi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sigma Chi was changed by 1,300 volts (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897992 on 2012-02-29T21:36:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yuiop

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Yuiop, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zad68 (talk) 21:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Slaviša Ubiparipović

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Slaviša Ubiparipović, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:08, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At Talk:Slaviša Ubiparipović you wrote "This article needs major development and I'm not experienced." Unfortunately, the article has already been deleted as the result of a deletion discussion twice; once in April of 2010 and once earlier today. Continuing to recreate the article with no information doesn't really help matters. Since the community has failed to find any notability for this athlete, it is unlikely that an article about him can be created by you or anyone else. If you absolutely insist that Wikipedia should have an article about him, make a request at requested articles and see if any knowledgeable editors pick up the ball. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gayzing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gayzing was changed by 1,300 volts (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-02-29T22:12:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:12, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]