User talk:03alpe01
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Sandahl (♀) 17:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to University of Southampton, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Luke (Talk) 18:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello 03alpe01, I have reverted your edit on my talk page because it is considered a personal attack. Please comment on the content, not the contributor. Persistent personal attacks will result in a block. Thank you. -- Luke (Talk) 00:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:LuK3. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Luke (Talk) 23:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:LuK3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. -- Luke (Talk) 19:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
03alpe01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia, Please unblock me 03alpe01. The comments that were allegedly made by me, were actually made by my friend who thought he was being clever and funny, when in actual fact he was being hurtful. I am genuinely sorry for my friend's actions and will willingly apologise to anyone my friend's comments may have offended. Please seriously consider unblocking me from editing Wikipedia as I have given an honest explanation as to why I was blocked. Regards, 03alpe01
Decline reason:
Yeah, your friend vandalized with this account since 2010. Max Semenik (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
03alpe01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
so what are you saying then??? that my friend has done this before? 03alpe01 (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
What we're saying is that A) since this account has zero productive edits over a span of several year, I find it hard to believe that each time it was somebody else using your account, which you've never used and B) Even if I did believe you (which I don't), by claiming your friend used your account you have claimed that it is compromised which means that per our rules it can never be unblocked. Whoops Jac16888 Talk 21:01, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
03alpe01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
fine dont believe me then, but everyone has the right to explain themsevles truthfully and honestly, which I have now done. The fact that you know nothing about me as a person, could lead me onto thinking that you are picking on me. And what if I do decide to make a constructive edit? The World will miss out on a piece of potentially valuable information. And just to verify that you are not nasty, could you please explain why you said " Whoops " at the end of your last message, as if you were trying to rub it in?
Decline reason:
See below. Max Semenik (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
03alpe01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I find that very insulting that you feel the need to rub it in like that with that Whoops on the end. I'm trying to make peace here and come to a truce, but you are still acting like stuck up sad idiotic morons03alpe01 (talk) 21:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
How do you think, did the person you attacked on Wikipedia feel insulted? Anyway, I was going to offer you a second chance in response to your previous unblock request, however after I've seen this one, I'm revoking your right to edit this page as you're not posting constructive requests. Max Semenik (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.