Jump to content

User talk:01234567editor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

01234567editor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 01234567editor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


June 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Sir Joseph. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tefillin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit summary states that you removed an "urban myth" that was in the article as a "fact." When in fact the article doesn't say that it's a fact, but that traditions exist that the following women wore tefillin. So, your edit summary was misleading, and you removed sourced content. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin M. Weiner (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:39, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heichal HaTorah

[edit]

Hello 01234567editor, I don't understand this tag [1] that you placed on the Heichal HaTorah article, which is more intended for a truly invisible subject or even a blatant promotional article, not an educational institution mentioned in 3rd party sources such as The Wall Street Journal and others. If you really think it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia, you can try to nominate it for deletion, but that option does not appear to me to be at all a slam dunk. But just adding a tag when there already is one asking for more sources seems to me to be overkill. Feel free to respond here if you wish - I am watching the page. StonyBrook (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Melvin M. Weiner

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 01234567editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melvin M. Weiner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]