User talk:01234567editor
01234567editor, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi 01234567editor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC) |
June 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Sir Joseph. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tefillin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit summary states that you removed an "urban myth" that was in the article as a "fact." When in fact the article doesn't say that it's a fact, but that traditions exist that the following women wore tefillin. So, your edit summary was misleading, and you removed sourced content. Sir Joseph (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Melvin M. Weiner (July 3)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melvin M. Weiner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Melvin M. Weiner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Heichal HaTorah
[edit]Hello 01234567editor, I don't understand this tag [1] that you placed on the Heichal HaTorah article, which is more intended for a truly invisible subject or even a blatant promotional article, not an educational institution mentioned in 3rd party sources such as The Wall Street Journal and others. If you really think it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia, you can try to nominate it for deletion, but that option does not appear to me to be at all a slam dunk. But just adding a tag when there already is one asking for more sources seems to me to be overkill. Feel free to respond here if you wish - I am watching the page. StonyBrook (talk) 09:34, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Melvin M. Weiner
[edit]Hello, 01234567editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melvin M. Weiner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)