User talk:0"cleopatra"0

Welcome!

Hello, 0"cleopatra"0, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as CSM Central School, Edassery, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jalen Folf (talk) 16:09, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! 0"cleopatra"0, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Jalen Folf (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to National University of Kharkiv. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I would like to request you a help to rename article National University of Kharkiv to its realname VN Karazin Kharkiv National University. Now, its in REDIRECT. But to prevent people's from misunderstanding same university or not! Please correct it. Or Drop a message to me, If i need to change instead of you. Thanks, Regards 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lalbagh (2021 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lalbagh (2021 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu Raveendran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vishnu Raveendran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i oppose your choice. When i evaluated article Draft:Vishnu Raveendran, it has sufficient references as citation with famous news coverage channels like BBC, Times of India, NewsExpress, Mathrubhumi, & many more. Article about that Indian photographer has 24 References, which prove what he is! The sources are verifable & no any dead links attached to it. So, as a biography of a living person, he have enough citations. So i request you to move back again to namespace from draft or whether revert your last edit. Thanks, 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 18:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 0"cleopatra"0. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the kind to notified me about this!

Sorry for the inconvenience... But i am not a paid editor or not writing about anything compared to me or i know. I am a wikipedia editor of mainly about places, schools/Universities and sometimes i trying to write about humans(person) and about movies or films.

I don't believe i have a internal or external connection with the subject am writing about, i am collecting data's from source (google/chrome) about everything and writing it in my own way. But, according to article "Krishnajeev", I have seen him directly once & taken photo, because he is a person in my country with many fans. As a fan, i asked him for a photo & i dont have any connection with him rather than that. If you believe, is there any problem or need clean up, you can put a notice on article. And about excessive number of citations because, i thinks that adding more references to a Article, will be stable in wikipedia more compared to 10 or 15 references for a Biography of a living person.

Ok anyway, thanks for the reply, enjoy wikipedia...0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles - again

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nihal Sadiq, you may be blocked from editing.
You were clearly asked, above, not to add links to draft articles, but are still doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks for the warning. As a human being, all will make some mistakes, so please correct it. Instead of blocking, you can talk this in article talk page to correct the mistake. As a wikipedia beginner, am learning from other editors.

Thanks for understanding... 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 06:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vishnu Raveendran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vishnu Raveendran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rahul V Raj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahul V Raj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahul V Raj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JW 1961^Talk 19:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with G. Suresh Kumar. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rahul V Raj. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Giant Snowman 20:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i didnt removed deletion discussion notice, but i removed some bad references & added citations needed notice & BLP sources notice to clean ul the article to be good. I have combined all 3 notices in 1 multiple issues. Anyway i removed 10 References, but you done undo my edits... Please mske it back done by me

Thanks 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

Just a note that putting fake barnstars on your user page, and claiming that Miniapolis awarded them to you, is a violation of the WP:Signature forgery policy. There is no GOCE October 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive, as October is a Blitz month, and you have not enrolled in any drives or blitzes: [1]. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience. Now i have corrected. Thanks for sharing. Regards 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 20:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krishnajeev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krishnajeev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishnajeev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alphaonekannan (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nihal Sadiq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nihal Sadiq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nihal Sadiq (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Alphaonekannan (talk) 21:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on combining and removing/hiding AfD template in Articles

Hi, I appreciate your effort in being a contributor to Wikipedia. I noticed that the AfD templates on your articles are combined or removed by yourself more than a time in Krishnajeev & Nihal Sadiq. Keep the templates as to how it is placed there, you can improve the articles during the deletion nomination. But removing and hiding the tag from the article is not a good practice. Thank you Onmyway22 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the inconvenience. I think you are hailing from Kerala and a malayali. Articles Krishnajeev and Nihal Sadiq has been added deletion notice by users. I don't know what the reason it have been addedin discussiono talk page. Can you just check & help me how to remove the notice from article? Thanks 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@0"cleopatra"0: Having bulk references does not make the article notable. Cite the reference which only needed there. Your those two article is not meeting General Notability Guidlines. Refer WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Thank you. Onmyway22 (talk) 10:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onmyway22: :I have provided only reliable sources with verified valuable references in articles Krishnajeev, Nihal Sadiq and Rahul V Raj. Still why always rejects biography of living person when i write everytime... Article about Tiktoker is highly verified & accepted article, now get deletion notice. Article about a musician Nihal Sadiq is Organic news, written by journalist in channels like matrubhumi, bbc, timesofindia, etc.. Still deletion notice by lack of references. And article about footballer get deletion notice because, the professional league Santosh Trophy was not included, thats why its not eligible to become article in wikipedia. All the 3 articles about living person have enough references which prove their profession and talent. Still some of them getting it back into deletion notice. Please help it into Mainspace article with your research..... Its mh request!!! 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, 0"cleopatra"0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Onmyway22 (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Krishnajeev

A tag has been placed on Krishnajeev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:0"cleopatra"0 reported by User:Onmyway22 (Result: ). Thank you. Onmyway22 (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Removal of a report about yourself from WP:AN3, removal of AfD and COI templates from the Krishnajeev TR article. EdJohnston (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

0"cleopatra"0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i did removal of AfD and COI templates from the Krishnajeev TR article because i have rewritten article into neutral point of view and decreased excessive citations and turned Krishnajeev TR into a normal article with enough Verified references. Only because of i cleared mistakes from the article, i removed notices too. I don't find that as a mistake. If it is, sorry for cleanuped a Article into good. 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were warned, repeatedly, that you cannot remove AfD notices from articles undergoing a deletion discussion. Your editing has been disruptive to several Wikipedia processes and you were blocked as a result. Please review WP:GAB if you plan on making another appeal. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ukrainian football defender, 2000s births stubs

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian football defender, 2000s births stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SockPopput Block?

Hello User:EdJohnston @EdJohnston:, My account is sockpuppeteer???!!... How? Can you give a detailed explanation and proof, how can i be using multiple accounts in wikipedia?. I am living in a hostel, majority are connected to same wifi. I don't know how many of them using wikipedia as editor. If there is, why am being blocked? And sockpuppeteer of "Xavier 500.30.10!!! Whose account is this. May be same IP Address, that doesn't mean am the user. I have currently done more than 460+edits in wikipedia and didn't vandalised or deleted articles or added misinformation on any wikipedias. Then why chose me as sockpuppeteer. Please, I need explanation for my Block from you. 0"cleopatra"0 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For more information, you should look at the SPI case, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xavier 500.30.10. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 0"cleopatra"0. On your user page you were taking credit for an article 'created by me', Ganeshamangalam, that was actually created by User:Xavier 500.30.10. A strange claim, if you truly have no connection to that editor. EdJohnston (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked TPA because of block evasion with Special:contributions/2409:4073:414:F541:68D6:41B5:8EB3:3AF9.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]